Which group is explicitly mentioned as at risk when using CEWs?

The mention of small children as an explicitly at-risk group when using Conducted Energy Weapons (CEWs), such as the Taser 7, is rooted in several important considerations. Small children have unique physiological characteristics that can heighten the risks associated with the use of CEWs.

Due to their smaller body size, lower body mass, and developing nervous systems, small children may experience more severe effects from electrical discharges compared to adults. The dosage and impact of the energy delivered can be disproportionately greater for them, potentially leading to significant medical concerns such as cardiac arrest, seizures, or other life-threatening conditions.

In addition to their physical attributes, small children often lack the ability to fully understand or respond appropriately to high-stress situations, which can limit their ability to de-escalate potentially volatile encounters. This creates scenarios where the use of CEWs could lead to greater risks and challenges in managing the aftermath of their application.

Recognizing the vulnerability of small children is imperative for law enforcement and those who operate CEWs, highlighting the need for increased caution and alternative de-escalation strategies when confronting individuals in this age group. This understanding informs training and guidelines surrounding the deployment of CEWs, emphasizing an elevated standard of care and consideration for vulnerable populations.